Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

E. & J. Gallo Winery, A California Corporation v. Proximo Spirits

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION


July 3, 2011

E. & J. GALLO WINERY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PROXIMO SPIRITS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AGAVERA CAMICHINES, S.A. DE C.V., A MEXICO CORPORATION; AND DOES 1-25,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

D. GREGORY DURBIN (SBN 81749) McCORMICK BARSTOW SHEPPARD WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 River Park Place East P.O. Box 28912 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 greg.durbin@mccormickbarstow.com D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712) NAOMI JANE GRAY (SBN 230171) MATTHEW A. STRATTON (SBN 254080) HARVEY SISKIND LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 pharvey@harveysiskind.com ngray@harveysiskind.com mstratton@harveysiskind.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant E. & J. Gallo Winery and Counterdefendants Ecco Domani USA, Inc. and Tequila Supremo, S.A. de C.V.

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER Case No. 1:10-CV-00411 LJO JLT MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE

Whereas this matter has been proceeding through discovery in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order dated February 16, 2011; and

Whereas both sides have experienced some unexpected delays in the identification and production of electronic records, necessitating that the parties request a slight adjustment in the lay discovery cut-off date; and

Whereas to accommodate personal scheduling issues of counsel, the parties also respectfully request the Court to extend the date to complete expert discovery by two weeks and to extend the settlement conference date by one week; and

Whereas there have been no previous requests to the Court to adjust the Scheduling Order; Now, therefore, the parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate and hereby request the Court to adjust the Scheduling Order (Docket No. 89) as follows:

1. The date for completion of all discovery pertaining to non-experts shall be extended from August 5, 2011 to September 2, 2011.

2. The date for completion of all discovery pertaining to experts shall be extended from October 7, 2011 to October 21, 2011.

3. The settlement conference, currently set for 9:00 a.m. on January 9, 2012, shall be rescheduled to 9:00 a.m. on Monday, January 16, 2012, in Courtroom 6.

Unless otherwise noted, the deadlines and dates in the existing Scheduling Order are unchanged, including the dates for dispositive motions, pre-trial and trial.

Respectfully submitted,

DATED:

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the CourtGRANTS the amendment to the scheduling order.

DEAC_Sig nature-END:

9j7khijed

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110703

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.