Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Midel Jackson v. Salinas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 5, 2011

MIDEL JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SALINAS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On May 16, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(c) requires a party to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition in response to a motion. Failure to oppose a motion to dismiss may be deemed a failure by plaintiff to prosecute his case and result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Therefore plaintiff will have a final opportunity in which to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

step1516.46osc

20110705

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.