IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 5, 2011
MIDEL JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
SALINAS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
On May 16, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(c) requires a party to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition in response to a motion. Failure to oppose a motion to dismiss may be deemed a failure by plaintiff to prosecute his case and result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Therefore plaintiff will have a final opportunity in which to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.