Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v. Au Optronics Corporation et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


July 6, 2011

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: U.S. Judge N M. Chen R

ORDER

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES

Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corp., SANYO Electric Co., Ltd., and SANYO North America Corporation (collectively "Defendants") andSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Plaintiff") stipulate to extend the time within which Defendants are permitted to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. The stipulated response date is August 15, 2011. This will not alter any deadlines fixed by the Court. In addition, Defendants waive the requirement that they be served with a summons pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 4.Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, BobSteinberg hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained fromthe other signatories listed below.

Bob Steinberg Attorneys for Defendants AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI James Yoon Attorneys for Defendants ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, BENQ CORP., and BENQ AMERICA CORP. Stipulation Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Michael A. Dorfman Attorneys for Defendants SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD. and SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION O'MELVENY AND MYERS LLP Brian Berliner Attorneys for Plaintiff SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

I N O Judge Edward O

Stipulation Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action. My business address is Latham & Watkins LLP, 355 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560.

On July 6, 2011, I served the following document described as:

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

by serving a true copy of the above-described document in the following manner:

BY U.S. MAIL

I am familiar with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice, documents are deposited with the Latham & Watkins LLP personnel responsible for depositing documents with the United States Postal Service; such documents are delivered to the United States Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business, with postage thereon fully prepaid. I deposited in Latham & Watkins LLP' interoffice mail a sealed envelope or package containing the above-described document and addressed as set forth below in accordance with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service:

James C. Yoon Michael A. Dorfman Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 650 Page Mill Road 525 West Monroe Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 Chicago, IL 60661-3693

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of, or permitted to practice before, this Court at whose direction the service was made and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on July 6, 2011, at Los Angeles, California.

Andy Magno

20110706

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.