IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
July 8, 2011
MICHAEL E. DAVIS, AKA TONY DAVIS,
COURTVINCE FERRAGAMO, AND BILLY JOE DUPREE,
ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge
United States District For the Northern District of California
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
On June 16, 2011, at the hearing on plaintiffs' motion to compel responses to discovery, Magistrate Judge Ryu granted in part and denied in part the motion and indicated that her written Order would follow. On June 30, 2011, defendant filed a motion for relief from the non-dispositive 21 pre-trial order. On July 5, 2011, the written Order was issued.
Accordingly, by July 15, 2011, defendant may file a supplemental brief, not to exceed 23 pages, addressing any additional points that may warrant discussion in light of the Magistrate Judge's written Order. By July 29, 2011, plaintiffs may file their response to defendant's 25 objections, not to exceed 8 pages. The matter will thereafter be submitted without oral argument or 26 further briefing unless otherwise ordered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DIST ATE RICT S T C O D U R E T T I 2
N N R O Judge Richard Seeborg O R T I 4 F 5 H L E A R F C 6 N DISTR CT OI
United States District Court For the Northern District of California
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.