Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tiffany (Nj), LLC, A Delaware Limited v. Miki Boutique

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


July 8, 2011

TIFFANY (NJ), LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., A DISSOLVED CALIFORNIA COMPLAINT CORPORATION, AND MEI NG, AN INDIVIDUAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY, D/B/A YUKI BOUTIQUE AND DOES 1-10,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney U.S. District Judge

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), Defendants MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California 20 corporation, and MEI NG, an individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE ("Defendants") and Plaintiff TIFFANY (NJ), LLC, and by and through their respective counsel, 22 hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed on 23 March 31, 2011.

Filed: March 31, 2011

RECITALS

1. On March 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging trademark infringement, counterfeiting, and false designation of origin, against Defendants.

2. Defendants were served with the summons and complaint on April 5, 2011. By previous stipulation, a response to the complaint by Defendants is currently due on July 11, 2011.

3. To allow for continuing settlement discussions, Plaintiff and Defendants have stipulated and agreed that a response to the complaint by Defendants shall be due no later than August 11, 2011. The parties aver that the requested extension will not alter the date of any event or 4 deadline already fixed by Court order.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel, that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by August 11, 2011.

Dated: July 6, 2011 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN PRATHER By: s/ Edwin K. Prather EDWIN K. PRATHER Attorneys for Defendants MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California corporation, and MEI NG, an individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE Dated: July 6, 2011 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN#71450) ANNE E. KEARNS (SBN #183336) By: s/ Anne E. Kearns ANNE E. KEARNS Attorneys for Plaintiff TIFFANY (NJ), GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by August 11, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45, § X.B

I, EDWIN K. PRATHER, herby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X.B, that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories listed above.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct.

Executed on July 6, 2011, in the City of San Francisco, California.

Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN PRATHER By: s/ Edwin K. Prather EDWIN K. PRATHER Attorneys for Defendants MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California corporation, and MEI NG, an individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE

20110708

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.