UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 8, 2011
FERNANDO RUBIO, PLAINTIFF,
WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANT.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Fernando Rubio and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the parties who have appeared in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Date: July 8, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Fernando Rubio Rubio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Date: July 8, 2011 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP Cheryl Johnson-Hartwell, Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
The parties having so stipulated, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END:
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.