Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raj Singh v. Stephen Lipworth

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 8, 2011

RAJ SINGH; SUMAN MEHTA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
STEPHEN LIPWORTH; STEVEN FINLEY, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

This case, in which plaintiffs are proceeding in propria persona and in forma pauperis, was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 1, 2011, the undersigned dismissed plaintiffs' first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), but provided plaintiffs thirty days to file a second amended complaint. Dckt. No. 6.

On July 1, 2011, plaintiffs filed a motion for a thirty day extension of time to file a second amended complaint. Dckt. No. 7. Plaintiffs contend that they need an extension of thirty days "so that they can cure the defects with the help of an attorney." Id.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint, Dckt. No. 7, is granted.

2. Plaintiffs have until August 8, 2011 to file a second amended complaint, as provided in the June 1, 2011 order. The second amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned to this case and must be labeled "Second Amended Complaint." Failure to timely file a second amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation this action be dismissed.

20110708

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.