Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kenneth S. Thomas v. Arnold Schwarzenegger

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 8, 2011

KENNETH S. THOMAS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
JAMES E. TILTON, DIRECTOR OF CDCR DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Otis D. Wright, II, District

ORDER

The court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Pursuant to FRCR 34 [28]. Plaintiff is reminded that discovery requests are not to be filed with the court, they are to be served on the party upon whom the discovery is being propounded. Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure clearly sets forth the procedure and the contents of the request. Specific attention should be paid to the drafting of requests so that the requests are not overly broad in terms of the categories of documents sought or unlimited in time. The request should bear some relevance to the issues framed by this litigation.

To the extent the Motion requests some action on the part of the court, the Motion is DENIED.

20110708

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.