IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 9, 2011
TOMMY ROY KEETON, PLAINTIFF,
COX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
On June 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed May 26, 2011, denying plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed May 26, 2011, is affirmed.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.