Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Julius anderson v. O. Towne; et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 11, 2011

JULIUS ANDERSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
O. TOWNE; ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Carlos T. Bea

ORDER

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2011, this court granted Plaintiff's motion for appointment of pro bono counsel and scheduled a settlement conference. (Docket No. 56). On May 31, 2011, this settlement conference took place, but no pro bono counsel had been appointed. Therefore, United States Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas scheduled an additional settlement conference to occur 60 days later. (Docket No. 61). As of the date of this order, this court is actively searching for pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The settlement conference is continued for an additional 30 days.

2. Once pro bono counsel is located and appointed, this court shall file an order setting the date and time of the settlement conference.

Hon. Carlos T. Bea U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation

20110711

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.