Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rodolfo Velasquez v. Patrick Donahoe

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 11, 2011

RODOLFO VELASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PATRICK DONAHOE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Presently before before the court is defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to the Northern District of California.*fn1 The court finds the motion is well taken and that in the interest of justice, the action should be transferred to the correct venue.

In this action, plaintiff alleges claims of discrimination, retaliation and wrongful termination arising out of his employment with the United States Postal Service. Although not specifically referenced in the complaint, it appears plaintiff brings his claims under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, et seq. and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. The statute governing venue of such claims provides in pertinent part that venue is proper "in the judicial district in which the aggrieved person would have worked but for the alleged unlawful employment practice." 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). Plaintiff here alleges he was terminated from his position of employment with the Postal Service at a unit located in San Francisco and seeks reinstatement into his job in that unit. Compl. at 9:1-2; Croteau Decl., ¶ 6. Venue is therefore proper in the Northern District of California.

Plaintiff also identifies in his complaint that "Venue is proper in the Northern District of California . . ." Complaint at 14. Moreover, even assuming that an individual defendants is an appropriate defendant in a case such as this (and individuals are not), defendant specifies that his immediate supervisor's work place was in the Northern District. Complaint at 12.

In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to transfer (dkt. no. 6) is granted; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.