Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ernest Medina v. Warden of Cmf-Vacaville

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 13, 2011

ERNEST MEDINA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WARDEN OF CMF-VACAVILLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By order filed April 27, 2011, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned and there are no other parties presently appearing.

Prior to screening, plaintiff requested an opportunity to amend his complaint, and this request was honored. Plaintiff was given guidance to correct the defects in his complaint. Plaintiff's initial complaint had not linked any defendants to the very sparse factual recitation. It would have been dismissed in any event. However, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed.

20110713

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.