Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ronald Moore v. Cnc Apex Corporation Dba Fosters Freeze

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 14, 2011

RONALD MOORE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CNC APEX CORPORATION DBA FOSTERS FREEZE, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

K. Randolph Moore, Esq., SBN 106933 Tanya E. Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 2 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATES SET IN SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER Complaint Filed: September 15, 2010 Current Trial Date: January 9, 2012

Plaintiff Ronald Moore ("Plaintiff"); Defendant, Cross-Claimant and Cross-Defendant CNC Apex Corporation dba Fosters Freeze; Cross-Defendants and Cross-Claimants Un Kyong and Eddie Chong; and Defendant, Cross-Claimant and Cross-Defendant Dubu, Inc. (Plaintiff, Defendants, Cross-Claimants and Cross-Defendants collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the Parties have been diligently undertaking to complete discovery, having taken depositions, exchanged written discovery, and conducted a site inspection with 28 their experts; Moore v. CNC Apex Corporation, et al.

WHEREAS, the settlement conference in this matter was continued to accommodate Plaintiff's counsel's unavailability which settlement conference is now currently set one day 3 prior to the dispositive motion deadline;

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to explore settlement prior to incurring the attorney fees which would result from the preparation of the dispositive motions;

WHEREAS, the expert witness discovery cut-off is the same date as the dispositive motion filing deadline which does not afford the Parties proper time to receive, review, and 8 properly incorporate the expert witness discovery into a dispositive motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, that the following deadlines be 11 continued from the dates currently scheduled to dates on or near the dates proposed below:

Current Date Proposed Date

Disclose Experts July 15, 2011 August 1, 2011

Disclose Supplemental Experts None August 19, 2011

Expert Cut-Off August 31, 2011 September 23, 2011

Non-Dispositive Motion Filing August 31, 2011 Unchanged

Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing September 30, 2011 Unchanged

Dispositive Motion Filing August 31, 2011 November 4, 2011

Dispositive Motion Hearing October 12, 2011 December 9, 2011

Settlement Conference August 30, 2011 Unchanged Pre-trial Conference November 16, 2011 February 20, 2012 Trial January 9, 2012 March 13, 2012

Dated: July 14, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

The Parties stipulation fails to set forth good cause for modification of the dates set in this Court's Scheduling Order and the request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110714

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.