UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- FRESNO DIVISION
July 14, 2011
SIMON V. GARCIA, AN INDIVIDUAL,
GORDON TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, WHICH WILL TRANSACT BUSINESS IN
CALIFORNIA AS L GORDON; STEVE GORDON, AN INDIVIDUAL; BOB GOLDBERG, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND
DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE,
CHRISTOPHER YANEZ AND EMMA YANEZ ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES, ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFFS,
GORDON TRUCKING, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 24 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Oliver W. Wanger
SUTTON HATMAKER LAW CORPORATION S. BRETT SUTTON 143107 2 firstname.lastname@example.org SUSAN K. HATMAKER 172543 3 email@example.com JARED HAGUE 251517 firstname.lastname@example.org 6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 214 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 449-1888 6 Facsimile: (559) 449-0177 Attorneys for Plaintiff SIMON V. GARCIA
ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASE (MEMBER) AND SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Complaint Filed: February 23, 2010
I. Date of Hearing.
July 11, 2011.
III. Summary of Hearing.
On July 11, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, the Court heard GARCIA's Motion for 45-day Stay of the YANEZ Case, and alternatively, Appointment of S. Brett Sutton, Esq. as Interim Class Counsel (hereinafter "Motion for Stay"), filed in the above-captioned matter. At 16 the same time, the Court heard YANEZ' Motion for Consolidation of Pending, and Appointment 17 of James R. Patterson, Esq. and Allison H. Goddard as Interim Class Counsel (hereinafter "Motion for Consolidation"), filed in Case No. 1:11-cv-00272-OWW-SMS, which action was previously designated as "related" to the GARCIA action.
The Court, having received the moving papers and exhibits of the parties with respect to GARCIA's Motion for Stay and YANEZ' Motion for Consolidation, and having received oral 22 argument on said motions by counsel in appearance, and the Court being duly advised in the 23 premises thereof now finds that YANEZ' Motion for Consolidation should be GRANTED, and GARCIA's Motion for Stay should be DENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
1. The GARCIA case 1:10-CV-00324-OWW-SKO to become the LEAD case and the YANEZ case 1:11-cv-00272-OWW-SMS to become the MEMBER case are hereby consolidated for all purposes;
2. All Parties shall appear at a Scheduling Conference on July 20, 2011 at 8:15 a.m. 6
The Parties shall meet and confer prior to the Scheduling Conference for the purpose of preparing a Joint Scheduling Statement. The Joint Scheduling Statement shall be filed with the Court on or before July 18, 2011;
3. The Court acknowledges that Counsel for GARCIA and Counsel for YANEZ agreed in open court that Counsel for GARCIA would informally take the lead at the July 22, 2011 mediation with GTI, that Counsel for YANEZ will attend and participate in the July 22, 2011 mediation, and that YANEZ agrees to contribute 25% of any and all mediator fees for the July 22, 2011 mediation; and
4. The deadlines previously set in the GARCIA action, including but not limited to, GARCIA's deadline to file a Motion for Class Certification, and the related deadlines for Opposition and Reply, are hereby off-calendar. The Scheduling Conference in the YANEZ action, previously set for August 16, 2011, is likewise off-calendar. Applicable deadlines shall be addressed by the Court's Order following the July 20, 2011 Scheduling Conference for the consolidated case.
OLIVER W. WANGER
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.