IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 15, 2011
CHRIS MAUCK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration (Doc. 22) of the Magistrate Judge's October 21, 2010 order.*fn1
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. In addition, after conducting a de novo review of this case, and carefully reviewing the entire file, the court finds the Magistrate Judge's October 21, 2010, order to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. The order is, therefore, affirmed.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 22) is denied;
2. The Magistrate Judge's October 21, 2010, order is affirmed;
3. The dismissal of plaintiff's claims for harassment against defendant Mauck, and all claims against defendants Statti and Lockwood is affirmed;
4. The dismissal of defendants Statti and Lockwood is affirmed;
5. This case proceeds on plaintiff's other claims against defendants Mauck and Thompson only; and
6. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.