Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
North Sacramento Land Company; et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service; et al
July 15, 2011
NORTH SACRAMENTO LAND COMPANY; ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
ORDER Based on the stipulation filed by the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the schedule for this case is adjusted as follows:
August 31, 2011: Administrative Record Filed September 30, 2011: Any Motions to Supplement Administrative Record October 21, 2011: Oppositions to Motions to Supplement Administrative Record November 4, 2011: Replies for Motions to Supplement Administrative Record
The existing schedule for Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) remains in effect, but will be automatically stayed if a Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record is filed. If Plaintiffs file a Motion to Supplement Administrative Record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 10 days after the Court acts on that motion.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...