UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
July 18, 2011
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
MED-SURGICAL SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, KRISHNA SUDHAKARAN, AN INDIVIDUAL,
MARK KIENE, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Claudia Wilken
MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373 email@example.com JAIDEEP VENKATESAN, Bar No. 211386 firstname.lastname@example.org BERGESON, LLP 303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 San Jose, CA 95110-2712 Telephone: (408) 291-6200 Facsimile: (408) 297-6000 6 Attorneys for Defendants MED-SURGICAL SERVICES, INC., KRISHNA SUDHAKARAN, and MARK KIENE ALI AALAEI, Bar No. 254713 email@example.com Ari Law, P.C. 22 Battery St., Suite #1000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 357-3600 Fax: (415) 357-3602 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, INC.
STIPULATION RE: AMENDMENT TO CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER; ORDER
COURTROOM: 2, 4th Floor Complaint filed: November 9, 2010 Trial Date: March 19, 2012
Plaintiff California Institute of Computer Assisted Surgery, Inc. ("CICAS"), together with Defendants Med-Surgical Services, Inc., Krishna Sudhakaran, and Mark Kiene ("Defendants"), by 3 and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS Defendants have filed a Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions That Comply With Patent Local Rule 3-1 and an Administrative Motion to Modify Case Management Deadlines requesting the Court to postpone several deadlines under the Patent Local Rules;
WHEREAS Plaintiff maintains that Defendants' motions should be DENIED and Plaintiff will file oppositions to such motions within the time allowed for opposition;
WHEREAS the parties' Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Chart is required to be filed by July 15, 2011; 11
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to postpone that deadline by one week
to give the
parties additional time to reach agreement on the construction of
1. The parties shall submit a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Chart [Patent L.R. 4-3] on July 22, 2011.
2. This Stipulation does not affect the claim construction briefing schedule set by the Court in the Case Management Order.
SO STIPULATED AND AGREED
In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from
the signatory below.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.