Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mark Heim v. Multimatic Dry Cleaning Machine Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- SAN JOSE


July 19, 2011

MARK HEIM,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION, THE ESTATE OF DONALD T. HEIM; MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, MAXINE HEIM; PROJECT ONE, A CALIFORNIA MULTIMATIC LLC, AND THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; WILLIAM KIRRBERG CORPORATION TO
BURGSTROM; ESTATE OF ERNIE WEBB; RESPOND TO MAXINE HEIM'S CITY OF WATSONVILLE; MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE
HEIM'S CORPORATION; MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION; LOCAL RULE 6-1(A) MULTIMATIC LLC, A NEW JERSEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MULTIMATIC CORPORATION AND MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION; THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS MULTIMATIC CORPORATION; AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINERY INC.; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20; DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Edward J. Davila

RICHARD A. DONGELL (SBN 128083) E R (rdongell@dlflawyers.com) T THOMAS F. VANDENBURG (SBN 163446) N GRANTED (tvandenburg@dlflawyers.com) U A 3 IAN P. CULVER (SBN 245106) I (iculver@dlflawyers.com) N 4 DONGELL LAWRENCE FINNEY LLP N J. vila R O J e d ar E d 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 45th Floor w R udg O Los Angeles, CA 90017-3609 T I Telephone: (213) 943-6100 H A Facsimile: (213) 943-6101 E R F C Attorneys for Defendants and Third Party Defendants DISTRICT MULTIMATIC LLC and THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION, formerly known as Multimatic Corporation, successor by merger with Multimatic Dry Cleaning Machine Corporation

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME OF SECOND AMENDED THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AND MARK FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ACTION FILED: August 26, 2010 AND RELATED ACTIONS. TRIAL DATE: None Set

LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED PLEADINGS

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Third Party Plaintiff MAXINE HEIM, Plaintiff

MARK HEIM and nominal Defendants and Third Party Defendants MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC LLC, and THE KIRRBERG CORPORATION (together the "Multimatic Entities"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the Multimatic Entities shall have until August 1, 2011, to respond to the Second Amended Third Party Complaint and First Amended Complaint of MAXINE HEIM and MARK HEIM, respectively.

This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

SO STIPULATED.

20110719

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.