Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brian Darnell Edwards v. High Desert State Prison

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 19, 2011

BRIAN DARNELL EDWARDS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER AND INDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 9, 2011, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a second amended complaint to cure the pleading defects as to the claims against defendant McDonald. The June 9, 2011 order warned plaintiff that if he did not file a second amended complaint, the court would recommend dismissal of defendant McDonald for the reasons stated in the previously vacated findings and recommendations. Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that defendant McDonald be dismissed for the reasons stated in the previously vacated findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2011 (Dkt. No. 17).

On July 7, 2011, defendants Mitchell, Cheney, Swingle and Turner-Gamberg filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to the amended complaint. Good cause appearing, this motion is granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 25) is granted;

2. Defendants' response to the first amended complaint is due twenty-one days following the adoption of the instant findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of defendant McDonald;

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant McDonald be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

edwa3461.36

20110719

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.