Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Andre Craver v. J. Hasty

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 20, 2011

ANDRE CRAVER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J. HASTY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 6, 2011, plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned.

Pursuant to this court's screening of plaintiff's original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court found that the complaint may state cognizable claims against defendants Hasty and Rayner, but did not state a claim against defendant Hubbard. (Dkt. No. 6.) The court gave plaintiff the option of proceeding on his original complaint or filing an amended complaint that added a cognizable claim against defendant Smith. Plaintiff chose to proceed on his original complaint against defendants Hasty and Rayner, effectively choosing to terminate this action against defendant Hubbard.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Hubbard is dismissed from this action.

20110720

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.