The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874) LAW OFFICE OF JOHN R. MANNING 1111 "H" Street, Suite 204 Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 444-3994 Fax (916) 447-0931 Attorney for Defendant LUIS TORRES-HERNANDEZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE
Date: August 26, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA through its undersigned counsel, Michael D. Anderson, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Luis Torres-Hernandez, John R. Manning, Esq., counsel for defendant Javier Hernandez-Lopez, Matthew C. Bockmon, Esq., counsel for defendant Juan Hernandez-Lopez, Olaf W. Headberg, Esq., and counsel for defendant Alejandro Bielma-Ortiz, David D. Fischer, Esq., that the status conference presently set for July 22, 2011 be continued to August 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference.
Further, all of the parties, the United States of America and all of the defendants as stated above, hereby agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under Title 18, United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare, specifically the continuance is requested to allow counsel time to review discovery and conduct investigation) from the date of the parties stipulation, July 21, 2011, to and including August 26, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the July 22, 2011 status conference be continued to August 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. I find that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161 (h) (7) (B) (iv) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to August 26, 2011.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...