UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 21, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO
JULY 29, 2011, AT 9:00 A.M.
Date: July 22, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, Paul Hemesath, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael Petrik, Jr., attorney for Mr. James, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for July 22, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., and reset it for July 29, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
Counsel for Mr. James requires further time to review discovery, and to confer with him.
The parties also stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through July 29, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. James' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. James in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4).
Dated: July 20, 2011 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Scott James Dated: July 20, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney M.Petrik for PAUL HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on July 29, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4). For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. James' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. James in a speedy trial.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.