Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Freddie Carl Sprinkle v. Thomas L. Carey

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 22, 2011

FREDDIE CARL SPRINKLE, PETITIONER,
v.
THOMAS L. CAREY, WARDEN, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, SOLANO, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: James K. Singleton, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER [Re: Motion at Docket No. 41]

At Docket No. 41 Freddie Carl Sprinkle, a state prisoner, filed a pro se Motion for Appointment of Counsel. According to the record in this case, Sprinkle is represented by Margaret Littlefield, Law Office of Michael Satris. Ms. Littlefield has not filed a request to withdraw as counsel of record,*fn1 accordingly she remains counsel of record. The record also indicates that, subsequent to the filing of the pending motion to appoint counsel, Ms. Littlefield filed Supplemental Briefing in compliance with this Court's Order.*fn2 Accordingly, because it is moot,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Motion for Appointment of Counsel at Docket No. 41 is DENIED, without prejudice.

James K. Singleton, Jr.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.