UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 26, 2011
KELLY ALICE KESSLER,
TINA HORNBEAK, WARDEN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DEFERRING CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR AN ) EVIDENTIARY HEARING UNTIL CONSIDERATION OF THE MERITS OF ) THE PETITION (DOC. 35)
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with the assistance of counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing, which was filed and served on Respondent on April 5, 2011. No opposition to the motion was filed.
A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of its cases with economy of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-255 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992).
Here, Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing is appropriately considered when the Court reviews the case in full and considers the merits of the petition. Further, there are cases other than Petitioner's that became ready for consideration of the merits earlier than Petitioner's case.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that consideration of Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing is DEFERRED until the Court considers the merits of the petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.