Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cave Consulting Group, LLC v. Ingenix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 27, 2011

CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
INGENIX, INC., DEFENDANT.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

thirty-day extension of the time within which Defendant may answer or otherwise respond to the 3 The reason for the stipulation is that a new patent has recently issued to Defendant, and Defendant needs additional time to evaluate whether its pleading in response to the First 6

The extension will not impact the schedule for the case, as the Case Management

Conference is currently set for October 14, 2011. 9

10 from May 13, 2011 to June 17, 2011, as the parties we attempting to settle the dispute. 11

Management Conference was re-set sua sponte to October 14, 2011. 13

Amended Complaint be extended until July 11, 2011. 15

August 31, 2011, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. 17

Respectfully submitted, 18 Dated: July 27, 2011 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE 19 20 By: /s/ David W. Harlan Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) the parties through their undersigned counsel stipulate to a First Amended Complaint, up to and including August 31, 2011. 4

Amended Complaint should include a counterclaim with respect to this recently issued patent. 7

Previously, the parties requested that the Case Management Conference be continued Subsequently the case was reassigned to the Honorable Edward J. Davila, and the Case

On May 27, 2011, the parties requested that the deadline for Plaintiff to serve the First

Accordingly, the parties stipulate that Defendant shall have up to and including

Dated: July 27, 2011 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP By: /s/ Sri K. Sankaran Sri K. Sankaran

ATTORNEY'S E-FILING ATTESTATION

As the attorney e-filing this document, and pursuant to General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby 3 attest that Plaintiff's counsel, David W. Harlan, of Armstrong Teasdale, 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800, St. Louis, MO 63105, (314) 621-5070, has concurred in the filing of this document. 5 6

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP By: /s/ Sri K. Sankaran Sri K. Sankaran ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT INGENIX, INC.

20110727

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.