Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Centrify Corporation v. Quest Software

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


July 29, 2011

CENTRIFY CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
QUEST SOFTWARE, INC.
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Centrify Corporation ("Centrify") and Defendant Quest Software, Inc. ("Quest") stipulate that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Centrify may file a Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (attached as Exhibit A) in the above-captioned action.

The Second Amended Complaint adds an explicit request for an accounting to determine the amount 6 of damages suffered by Centrify in between the close of fact discovery and the entry of final 7 judgment. The parties respectfully request an order granting leave for Centrify to file the Second Amended Complaint.

Dated: July 26, 2011 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Menesh S. Patel Attorneys for Plaintiff Centrify Corp. Dated: July 26, 2011 COOLEY LLP 16 Orion Armon Attorneys for Defendant Quest Software, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories shown above.

20110729

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.