UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
July 29, 2011
QUEST SOFTWARE, INC.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Centrify Corporation ("Centrify") and Defendant Quest Software, Inc. ("Quest") stipulate that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Centrify may file a Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (attached as Exhibit A) in the above-captioned action.
The Second Amended Complaint adds an explicit request for an accounting to determine the amount 6 of damages suffered by Centrify in between the close of fact discovery and the entry of final 7 judgment. The parties respectfully request an order granting leave for Centrify to file the Second Amended Complaint.
Dated: July 26, 2011 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Menesh S. Patel Attorneys for Plaintiff Centrify Corp. Dated: July 26, 2011 COOLEY LLP 16 Orion Armon Attorneys for Defendant Quest Software, Inc.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that
concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.