Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Inc., A Texas Corporation v. East Charleston

August 1, 2011

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EAST CHARLESTON, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION;
PACIFIC AMERICAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge

J. THOMAS BOER (State Bar No. 199563); jtb@bcltlaw.com RICHARD C. COFFIN (State Bar No. 70562); rcc@bcltlaw.com LAURA S. BERNARD (State Bar No. 197556); lsb@bcltlaw.com BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP 350 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1435 Telephone: (415) 228-5400 Fax: (415) 228-5450 Attorneys for Plaintiff SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, INC.

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF J. THOMAS BOER STIPULATION

WHEREAS, plaintiff Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed the complaint in this matter on May 27, 2011;

WHEREAS, defendants East Charleston, Inc., and Pacific American Management Company (collectively, "Defendants") waived service of process of the complaint and, consistent 24 with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and the applicable Local Rules, Defendants' responses 25 to the complaint are not due until August 15, 2011;

WHEREAS, the Court issued its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines on May 27, 2011, which set the date of the initial case management conference 28 for August 23, 2011;

case management conference and the parties' obligations under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants agree that it would be beneficial to postpone the Rule 26 until Defendants have served their responses to the complaint, so that counsel for the 4 parties can have a more meaningful and productive Rule 26 conference.

NOW THEREFORE, consistent with Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and Defendants jointly stipulate to, and ask the Court to enter the attached proposed order setting the 7 following case management deadlines: September 13, 2011 Last day to:

� Meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan � File ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel � File either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference September 27, 2011 Last day to: � File Rule 26(f) Report � Complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report � File Case Management Statement per Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement � File consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge October 4, 2011 Case Management Conference 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION OF J. THOMAS BOER

I, J. Thomas Boer, declare as ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.