UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 1, 2011
HUCHINS, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON DISCOVERY SCHEDULE AS MOOT
(ECF Nos. 54, 64)
AMENDED SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER (ECF No. 130)
Amended Pleading Deadline: 09/15/2011
Amended Discovery Deadline: 11/15/2011 Amended Pretrial Dispositive Motion Deadline: 01/13/2012
Plaintiff Daniel Manriquez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the complaint, filed March 11, 2009, against Defendants J. Huchins, J. Reynoso, M. Hacker, R. Roberson, C. Munoz, D. Daley, P. Perez, Pax, C. Morse, Omos, and Clausings for cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 22, 2011, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the discovery schedule. (ECF No. 130.)
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the scheduling order filed on September 22, 2010, is HEREBY AMENDED as follows:
a. The deadline to file an amended pleading is extended to September 15, 2011;
b. The deadline for the completion of all discovery, including filing motions to compel, is extended to November 15, 2011;
c. The deadline for filing pre-trial dispositive motions is extended to January 13, 2012; and
d. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before the expiration of the deadline in question, and will only be granted on a showing of good cause;
2. Plaintiff's motion for a stay of briefing schedule, filed March 3, 2011, is DENIED as moot; and
3. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time on the discovery schedule, filed March 30, 2011, is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.