The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STRIKE AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT
On June 14, 2011, Defendant FDIC, as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, filed a Motion to Strike Punitive Damages, Statutory Damages, Injunctive Relief, Equitable Relief, and 24 Attorney's Fees from Plaintiffs' Complaint and a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. Dkt. 25 Nos. 6 and 9 ("FDIC's motions"). Also on June 14, Defendants California Reconveyance 26 Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association, and US Bank National Association filed a 27 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. Dkt. No. 8 ("Remaining Defendants' motion"). For the 28 reasons discussed below, these three motions are DENIED as MOOT.
On July 12, 2011, the Court issued an Order , pursuant to the parties' stipulation, dismissing 2 all of Plaintiffs' Causes of Action against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") as 3 receiver of Washington Mutual Bank (erroneously sued as "Washington Mutual Bank, FA" and 4 "FDIC"), Washington Mutual Bank, and the FDIC, with prejudice. See Dkt. No. 25. Therefore, 5 FDIC's motions are MOOT, and are therefore DENIED, with prejudice. 6
On July 12, 2011, the Court issued an Order, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, granting Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. As a result, as the Remaining Defendants acknowledge 8 in their Case Management Statement, see Dkt. No. 30, at 3, the Remaining Defendants' motion to 9 dismiss, is MOOT, and is therefore DENIED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...