The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
forth the following timing regarding the filing of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss to Lead 3
Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") and the briefing in opposition 4 and reply thereto (the "Briefing Schedule"): 5
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, this Court issued an order in the above-captioned action setting
(i) Defendants shall file their Motion to Dismiss by July 1, 2011;
(ii) Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by August 16, 2011; and
(iii) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by September 16, 2011;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the June 7, 2011 order, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on July 1, 2011; 12 13 period spanning over two years and is subject to the heightened pleading standards set forth in the 14
WHEREAS, in light of certain scheduling conflicts that have arisen in other cases and from 16 attorney and other personnel turnover, and in light of the fact that the hearing on the Motion to 17 Dismiss is not scheduled until October 28, 2011, Lead Plaintiff has requested and Defendants have 18 agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, to modify the Briefing Schedule as follows: 19
WHEREAS, this action involves complex allegations against multiple defendants for a Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; and 15
(i) Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011;
(ii) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by ...