UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 3, 2011
IN RE IMMERSION CORPORATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
forth the following timing regarding the filing of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss to Lead 3
Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") and the briefing in opposition 4 and reply thereto (the "Briefing Schedule"): 5
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, this Court issued an order in the above-captioned action setting
(i) Defendants shall file their Motion to Dismiss by July 1, 2011;
(ii) Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by August 16, 2011; and
(iii) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by September 16, 2011;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the June 7, 2011 order, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on July 1, 2011; 12 13 period spanning over two years and is subject to the heightened pleading standards set forth in the 14
WHEREAS, in light of certain scheduling conflicts that have arisen in other cases and from 16 attorney and other personnel turnover, and in light of the fact that the hearing on the Motion to 17 Dismiss is not scheduled until October 28, 2011, Lead Plaintiff has requested and Defendants have 18 agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, to modify the Briefing Schedule as follows: 19
WHEREAS, this action involves complex allegations against multiple defendants for a Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; and 15
(i) Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011;
(ii) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by October 14, 2011; and
(iii) The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall still be held on October 28, 2011 or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard;
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the 2 undersigned counsel for the parties, that Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Defendants' 3 Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011 and Defendants shall file any reply in support of their 4 Motion to Dismiss by October 14, 2011. 5
DATED: August 2, 2011 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP WILLOW E. RADCLIFFE SARAH R. HOLLOWAY /s/ SARAH R. HOLLOWAY Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs BROWER PIVEN A Professional Corporation DAVID A.P. BROWER 488 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: 212/501-9000 212/501-0300 (fax) Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs DATED: August 2, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP SUSAN S. MUCK JENNIFER C. BRETAN /s/ JENNIFER C. BRETAN 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/875-2300 415/281-1350 (fax) Attorneys for Defendants Immersion Corporation, Victor A. Viegas, Clent Richardson, Stephen Ambler and Richard Vogel
I, Sarah R. Holloway, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. 3
In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jennifer C. Bretan has concurred in 4 this filing. 5
/s/ SARAH R. HOLLOWAY
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011; 12
2. Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by October 14, 2011; and
3. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall be held on October 28, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.