IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 7, 2011
PATRICIA L. COLLINS, PLAINTIFF,
CHESAPEAKE COMMONS HOLDINGS, LLC; SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; AND DOES 1-20, DEFENDANTS.
On June 28, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 28, 2011, are ADOPTED; and
2. SHRA's motion for summary judgment (ECF 28) is granted.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.