UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 9, 2011
ROBERTO A. SOTELO,
T. BIRRING, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FROM COURT'S CALENDAR UNTIL MOTION IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 230 (Doc. 41)
On January 25, 2011, Defendants Birring and Das filed a motion for summary judgment. Subsequently, the Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff and a scheduling conference is set for October 27, 2011. On July 26, 2011, the Court ordered Defendants to file a notice either withdrawing their motion pending further scheduling or stating their intent to stand by their motion as filed. On August 5, 2011, Defendants notified the Court that they do not wish to withdraw their motion and they intend to stand by the motion as is.
Accordingly, in light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is ORDERED CONTINUED from the Court's calendar until Plaintiff's opposition is filed and the motion is submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230.*fn1
IT IS SO ORDERED.