Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Nible v. Mike Knowles

August 9, 2011

WILLIAM NIBLE,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIKE KNOWLES, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 56) PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Order

Plaintiff William Nible ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR"). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's second amended complaint against Defendant E. Flores for violation of the First Amendment.

Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to compel, filed June 13, 2011. Doc. 56. No opposition was timely filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), the matter is submitted.

I. Motion To Compel

Defendant seeks to compel answers to ten special interrogatories. Defendant served these interrogatories on March 10, 2011. Terhorst Decl, Ex. A. Plaintiff did not serve answers to the interrogatories. Id.

Interrogatory No. 1: Please state all facts which support your contention that defendant E. FLORES violated your civil or constitutional rights.

Interrogatory No. 2: Please identify each of your "civil" or "constitutional" rights that you contend was violated by defendant E. FLORES.

Interrogatory No. 3: Please describe each incident involving defendant E. FLORES that you contend constituted a violation of your civil or constitutional rights.

Interrogatory No. 4: Please state all facts that support your contention that you sustained injury or damage as a result of defendant E. FLORES' acts or omissions.

Interrogatory No. 5: Please state all facts in support of your contention that you exhausted administrative remedies with regard to your claims against defendant E. FLORES.

Interrogatory No. 6: Please identify all documents that support your contention that you exhausted administrative remedies with regard to your claims against defendant E. FLORES.

Interrogatory No. 7: Please identify all documents that support your contention that defendant E. FLORES violated your civil or constitutional rights.

Interrogatory No. 8: Please identify all documents that support your contention that you suffered injury or harm as result of the purported ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.