Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Timothy Watts v. R. Ramos

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 10, 2011

TIMOTHY WATTS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
R. RAMOS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 35). It is not clear whether plaintiff seeks an order compelling initial responses to discovery requests or further responses. This is because plaintiff does not state the dates discovery was served, whether defendants responded, and, if so, how responses are inadequate. Absent this basic information, the court cannot evaluate whether relief is warranted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 35) is denied.

20110810

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.