Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rambus Inc v. International Business Machines E. Hulse; Corporation

August 11, 2011

RAMBUS INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES E. HULSE; CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge Northern District of California

Barbara Clarke McCurdy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) barbara.mccurdy@finnegan.com Naveen Modi (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) naveen.modi@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Tina E. Hulse (CA Bar No. 232936) tina.hulse@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Attorneys for Plaintiff Rambus Inc.

STIPULATION RE: CASE SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF TINA

[PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION AND

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Rambus Inc. ("Rambus") and Defendant

International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"), through their respective counsel of record, 3 respectfully request, and with the Court's permission, stipulate to a one-week extension of the deadline for filing the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement pursuant to Patent L.R. 4.3 so that the parties can discuss an alternative proposal for disposing of this matter and related 6 case, International Business Machines Corp. v. Rambus Inc., No. C 10-04017 JSW. By this extension, the parties do not request modifying the previously ordered briefing schedule for claim 8 construction or the dates for the Court's technology tutorial or claim construction hearing. More specifically, with the Court's permission, the parties hereby stipulate that the current schedule set 10 forth in the July 12, 2011, Stipulated Order [Dkt. 68] be modified as follows:

EVENT CURRENT SCHEDULE PROPOSED DATE

Joint Claim Construction and August 12, 2011 August 19, 2011 Prehearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3) -- Includes Expert Testimony. Parties must attach copies of patents, make 15 available file histories to Court 16 for each involved patent Completion of Claim September 6, 2011 Same Construction Discovery (Patent L.R. 4-4)

Rambus Opening Claim September 19, 2011 Same Construction Brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(a)). 25 page limit IBM Responsive Claim October 4, 2011 Same Construction Brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(b)). 25 page limit Rambus - Reply Brief and any October 11, 2011 Same evidence directly rebutting the 25 supporting evidence (Patent L.R. 4-5(c)). - 15 page limit Amended Joint Claim Construction Statement EVENT CURRENT SCHEDULE PROPOSED DATE

Tutorial for the Court November 1, 2011 Same

Claim Construction November 15, 2011 Same

("Markman") Hearing(Patent

L.R. 4-6).

By her signature below, counsel for Plaintiff attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.