IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 15, 2011
ANTHONY JAMES WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
By an order filed June 24, 2011, petitioner was ordered to file, within thirty days, an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee, or request the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice. Petitioner was cautioned that failure to timely comply with the court's order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.*fn1 The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).