UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 17, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
DIONISIO ROBLES PADILLA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorneys for Defendant DIONISIO ROBLES PADILLA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO
SEPTEMBER 12, 2011, AT 8:30 A.M.
Date: August 22, 2011
Time: 8:30 a.m.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, Jill M. Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael Petrik, Jr., attorney for Mr. Padilla, that the Court vacate the status conference scheduled for August 22, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., and reset it for September 12, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.
Defense counsel requires the continuance to review discovery and confer with Mr. Padilla.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through September 12, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Padilla's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Padilla in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on September 12, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Padilla's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Padilla in a speedy trial.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.