Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Karol Davenport v. First Financial

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


August 19, 2011

KAROL DAVENPORT,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FIRST FINANCIAL, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

E-Filed 8/19/11

ORDER RE: MOTION TO EXPUNGE

Former defendants U.S. Bank and Litton Loan ask the Court to expunge a lis pendens 19 plaintiff Karol Davenport recorded on January 14, 2010 following the sale of her home at 20 foreclosure. All claims brought against U.S. Bank and Litton Loan have been dismissed, and 21 Davenport has not included either as a defendant in the most recent iteration of her complaint. 22 Because no "real property" claims remain against them, these former defendants insist that the lis 23 pendens must be expunged. 24 Under California law, a court "shall" expunge a lis pendens if it finds that "the claimant has 25 not established by a preponderance of the evidence the probable validity of the real property claim." 26 Cal. Civ. Proc. § 405.32. "Probable validity" means that "it is more likely than not that the claimant 27 will obtain a judgment against the defendant on the claim." Orange County v. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp. Ltd., 52 F.3d 821, 824 (9th Cir. 1995). Davenport argues that, even though U.S. Bank and Litton Loan are no longer defendants, she has nonetheless included a real property 2 claim-in the form of a claim for declaratory relief-against Litton Loan. She believes the original 3 note is null and void, and therefore that the ultimate sale at foreclosure was also tainted. Because 4 she represents that the ability to satisfy the "probable validity" evidentiary requirement depends on 5 the result of on-going discovery with First Financial, Davenport requests an extension of the hearing 6 date. That request shall be granted, and the September 1, 2011 hearing date is vacated. On or 7 before November 3, 2011, Davenport may file a brief of no more than seven pages of text updating 8 the portion of her opposition that addresses her evidentiary burden. U.S. Bank and Litton may 9 respond, subject to identical page limits, on or before November 10, 2011. The matter will then be 10 taken under submission without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and an order on the motion to expunge shall issue thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110819

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.