UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 19, 2011
BRANDON L. SHERMAN,
F. GONZALES, ET AL.,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DENY DEFENDANT MARTINEZ'S REVISED INTERROGATORIES (Doc. 65)
Plaintiff Brandon L. Sherman ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court deny Defendant Martinez's revised interrogatories. (Doc. 65). On July 28, 2011, Defendants filed an opposition. (Doc. 69). Plaintiff claims that Martinez's revised the responses to her interrogatories after the Court's deadline for amended pleadings. (Doc. 65). Interrogatories are not "pleadings" and under Rule 26(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, parties are required to supplement or correct a response to an interrogatory if the party leans that their original response was incomplete or correct. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1)(A). Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby orders that Plaintiff's motion filed on July 18, 2011, is DENIED. (Doc. 65).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.