The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT (ECF No. 208.)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Gary K. Ravet's motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. (Mot. to Set Aside, ECF No. 208.) Also before the Court is Defendant Joel Wohlfeil's opposition, (Opp'n, ECF No. 212), and Plaintiff's reply, (Reply, ECF No. 214). After consideration, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to set aside judgment.
Plaintiff moves this Court to set aside the judgment entered on January 14, 2011. (ECF No. 199.) The judgment was "against Plaintiffs, GARY K. RAVET and the GARY K. RAVET CHILDRENS TRUST, jointly and severally, and in favor of Defendant JOEL WOLHFEIL, in the amount of $14,075." (Id.) Plaintiff argues that under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6), the judgment should be set aside because it names an entity, the Gary K. Ravet Childrens Trust, "that was never a party to this action and this court had no jurisdiction over." (Mot. to Set Aside 3.)
The question before the Court is whether judgment can be properly entered against the Gary K. Ravet Childrens Trust. Plaintiff argues that the Trust was never a party to this action and therefore judgment against the Trust is improper. (Id. 4.) The Court disagrees.
The operative complaint in this action is Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (SAC, ECF No. 144.) That complaint was filed by "GARY K. RAVET, an individual, and as Trustee of the GARY K. RAVET CHILDRENS TRUST." (Id.) And as Plaintiff cogently argued, the trustee of the trust, not the trust itself, is the proper party in a legal action. See Stoltenberg v. Newman, 179 Cal. App. 4th 293--94 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009); see also Mot. to Set Aside 5. By bringing the lawsuit as trustee of the Gary K. Ravet Childrens Trust, the trust is a party to this action and judgment can be entered against it.
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion to set aside judgment against the Trust is DENIED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...