IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 22, 2011
BILLY PAUL BIRDWELL, II., PLAINTIFF,
M. CATES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). Plaintiff alleges that many defendants interfered with plaintiff's ability to practice his religion, Odinism. This case does not contain complex matters of law, rather plaintiff states that he lacks sufficient training to properly conduct discovery and proceed to trial. Plaintiff's lack of legal expertise is insufficient to warrant the appointment of counsel. As the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 4, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 65) is denied.
GGH: AB bird0719.31
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.