Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ernest Cox v. T. North

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 22, 2011

ERNEST COX, PLAINTIFF,
v.
T. NORTH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. This action is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. Doc. 4. By order filed June 6, 2011, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the June 6, 2011 order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the June 6, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

GGH: AB; cox1217.fta

20110822

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.