UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
August 23, 2011
CORPORATE DOES 1 - 20; AND INDIVIDUAL DOES 21 - 40, INCLUSIVE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maria Elena James United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for Plaintiff
Ashley Williams and counsel for Defendant Starbucks Corporation, that pursuant to Federal Rule 3 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the above captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 4 in its entirety as to all claims and with respect to all parties, with each party to bear its or her own 5 costs and attorneys' fees. 6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PERKINS COIE LLP By: Jonmi Koo Jonmi N. Koo
Attorneys for Defendant STARBUCKS CORPORATION DATED: August 23, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF DEBORAH C. ENGLAND
By: Deborah C. England
Deborah C. England
Attorney for Plaintiff ASHLEY WILLIAMS
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED : August 23, 2011
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER
I, Jonmi N. Koo, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Deborah C. England, in filing 3 this document.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true 5 and correct. Executed this 23rd day of August, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
s Jonmi N. Koo
Jonmi N. Koo
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.