Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Luis Chacon, An Individual v. City of San Jose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


August 24, 2011

LUIS CHACON, AN INDIVIDUAL;
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, A MUNICIPALITY; SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, A ENE DEPARTMENT OF A MUNICIPALITY;
OFFICER BARTHELEMY, AN INDIVIDUAL; OFFICER EVALUATOR: CAROL WEBSTER MILLIE GROMDAHL AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1-60. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Howard R. LLoyd United States Magistrate Judge

*E-FILED 08-24-2011*

Sharonrose Cannistraci, CSBN 121827 CANNISTRACI LAW FIRM 16450 Los Gatos Blvd. Suite 110 Los Gatos, CA 95032 3 Phone: (408) 335.7368 Fax: (408) 402.8362 4 Email: sharonrose@cannistracilaw.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 6 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (#93249) 7 CLIFFORD GREENBERG, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#122612) Office of the City Attorney 8 200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor San Jose, California 95113-1905 9 Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 Los Gatos Blvd ● Suite 110 ● Los Gatos, CA 95032 Phone: 408.335.7368 ● Fax: 408.402.8362 10 E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov Attorneys for Defendants CANNISTRACI LAW FIRM

Date: Oct 4, 2011 17

Court:Hon. Howard R. LLoyd Time: 9:30 a.m.

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

[Re: Docket No. 14]

Carol Webster Millie, the court appointed evaluator for the Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE), 22 has no objection to the following stipulation and order to continue the ENE date to October 4, 2011 23 at 9:30 am. Good cause exists for the continuance inasmuch as Plaintiff's counsel has been unable 24 to reach Luis Chacon whose contact information in whole or part is not current, Plaintiff's counsel had a vacation conflict on the previously scheduled ENE date of August 9, 2011, Defendants wish 2 to take the deposition of Plaintiff prior to the ENE, the parties have timely submitted ENE briefs to 3 the evaluator, and continuance of the ENE will not affect the discovery or other deadlines in the 4 case. 5

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

IT IS SO ORDERED:

August , 2011

20110824

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.