Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Arlene Hensley v. the Bank of New York Mellon

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 24, 2011

ARLENE HENSLEY,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER VACATING AUGUST 29, 2011 HEARING DATE AND TAKING MATTER UNDER SUBMISSION

Currently pending before this Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss. This motion is set for hearing on August 29, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiff was required to file an opposition no later than August 15, 2011. Plaintiff, however, did not file an opposition. Due to Plaintiff's failure to file a timely opposition, she is in violation of the Local Rules. Plaintiff is therefore not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to Defendants' motion. See Local Rule 230(c).

The Court has reviewed the papers and has determined that this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of August 29, 2011, is VACATED, and the parties shall not appear at that time. As of August 29, 2011, the Court will take this matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

0m8i78

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20110824

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.