The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Illston, United States District Judge
This Document Relates To Individual INTERBOND CORPORATION OF AMERICA; P.C. RICHARD & SON LONG ISLAND CORPORATION; MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.; AND ABC APPLIANCE, INC. Case Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.) 20 Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI (N.D. Cal.); 3:11-cv-04119-SI (N.D. Cal.) MDL No. 1827 21 INTERBOND CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. P.C. RICHARD & SON LONG ISLAND CORPORATION; MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC. and ABC APPLIANCE, INC. Plaintiffs, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]
("BrandsMart") and P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, MARTA Cooperative of 3 WHEREAS, plaintiffs Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart USA America, Inc. and ABC Appliance, Inc. ("collectively, PC Richard Plaintiffs") filed complaints in 4 the above-captioned cases against AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, HannStar Display 7 Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc. Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (USA), 9 America, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Inc., Samsung 11 Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., 13 Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Stipulating Defendants") on June 3, 2011 and June 15, 2011, respectively 15
WHEREAS, BrandsMart and PC Richard Plaintiffs wish to avoid the burden and expense 17 of serving process on the Stipulating Defendants; 18 19 the Complaints; and 20 21 that proceeding on a unified response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties.
23 undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, BrandsMart and PC Richard Plaintiffs, 24 on the one hand, and the Stipulating Defendants, on the other hand, as follows: 25
Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Stipulating Defendants 27 of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of 28 personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., 6 Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., LG Inc., NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics 10 Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics 12 Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display 14 ("Complaints"); 16
WHEREAS, the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond to
WHEREAS, BrandsMart, PC Richard Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants believe
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
1. The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the Complaints under Federal Rule of respond to the Complaints will be ninety (90) days from the execution of this stipulation, subject 3 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1).
2. The Stipulating Defendants' deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise
DATED: July 8, 2011 /s/ William A. Isaacson William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice) Anne M. Nardacci (admitted pro hac vice) Christopher V. Fenlon (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 434-0600 Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 Email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER ...