Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Julia Diane Enriquez, Individually and As v. City of Fresno

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 25, 2011

JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO STEVEN ANTHONY VARGAS, DECEASED; JANE CARLOS VARGAS; AMADO VARGAS; VACATING STEVEN ANTHONY VARGAS, JR. HEARING DATE OF AUGUST MINOR THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 29, 2011, ON DEFENDANTS' JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ; ANGELO MOTION FOR SUMMARY ALECZANDER VARGAS (A MINOR ) JUDGMENT AND TAKING THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JULIA MATTER UNDER DIANE ENRIQUEZ; JOSE BLAS SUBMISSION FIGUEROA, JR. (A MINOR THROUGH HIS) GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ; HAILEY ROSE FIGUEROA (A MINOR THROUGH HER ) GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ; AND LEAH REALYNN GORTEZ-ENRIQUEZ (A MINOR THROUGH) HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JULIA DIANE ENRIQUEZ, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF FRESNO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; JERRY DYER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO; MIKE PALOMINO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A POLICE OFFICER OF THE CITY OF FRESNO,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

In this action for wrongful death, defendants City of Fresno, et al. have moved for summary judgment, or alternatively summary, adjudication. Doc. # 88. Hearing on Defendants' motion was scheduled for August 29, 2011. The court has preliminarily reviewed Defendants' motion, Plaintiffs' opposition and Defendants' reply. The court has determined that a detailed review of a very large volume of deposition and other discovery materials will be necessary prior to full consideration of Defendants' motion. Due to the press of other business now before the court, it is anticipated that several weeks may be required to accomplish a thorough review of the materials submitted. The court will therefore vacate the currently set hearing date of August 29, 2011, and will provisionally take the matter under submission. If, after further review and consideration of the materials submitted the court determines that oral argument is appropriate, the court will notify the parties for purposes of scheduling.

THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the currently set hearing date of August 29, 2011, is hereby VACATED and no party shall appear at that time. As of August 29, 2011, the court will provisionally take Defendants' motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication under submission and will thereafter issue its opinion, or will schedule oral argument, as the court determines appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20110825

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.