Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Timothy Hoyt v. City and County of San Francisco; George Gascon; and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


August 26, 2011

TIMOTHY HOYT,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; GEORGE GASCON; AND DOES 1-20,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

*E-Filed 08/26/11*

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, plaintiff moves to enlarge the time for the filing of his Opposition to defendants' motion for partial summary judgment and for the corresponding hearing.

According to plaintiff's counsel, due to unforeseen scheduling changes, he will be at trial in an 20 unrelated matter at the time plaintiff's Opposition is due. Counsel also states that he sought a 21 stipulation from defendants, but has not yet heard back. Good cause having been shown, plaintiffs' 22 request for a two week extension in the schedule on defendants' motion for summary judgment is 23 granted. Plaintiff's Opposition shall be due by September 15, 2011. Defendants' Reply is now due 24 on September 22, 2011. The hearing on September 22, 2011 is continued to October 6, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110826

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.