UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
August 29, 2011
JONATHAN C. KALTWASSER, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC F/K/A CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel
Joseph N. Kravec, Jr., Esquire (pro hac vice) J. Mark Moore, Esquire (180473) Wyatt A. Lison, Esquire Ira Spiro, Esquire (67641) STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE SPIRO MOSS, LLP & PAYNE, LLC 11377 West Olympic Boulevard, Fifth Floor Allegheny Building, 17th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683 429 Forbes Avenue Telephone: (310) 235-2468 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Facsimile: (310) 235-2456 Telephone: (412) 281 -8400 Email: email@example.com; Facsimile: (412) 281-1007 firstname.lastname@example.org Email: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org Michael D. Braun, Esquire (167416) Janet Lindner Spielberg, Esquire (221926) BRAUN LAW GROUP, P.C. LAW OFFICE OF JANET LINDNER 10680 West Pico Boulevard, Suite 280 SPIELBERG Los Angeles, CA 90064 12400 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 Telephone: (310) 836-6000 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Facsimile: (310) 836-6010 Telephone: (310) 392-8801 Email: email@example.com Facsimile: (310) 278-5938 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY LITIGATION AND MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS
Courtroom: 3 Date: September 9, 2011 Time: 9:00am
WHEREAS, on July 13, 2011, Defendant filed a Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation and a Motion to Strike Class Allegations (collectively "Defendant's Motions");
WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-4 provides Plaintiff twenty-five (25) pages for each memorandum responding to Defendant's Motions, and provides Defendant fifteen (15) pages for each reply memorandum;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation and to Defendant's Motion to Strike Class Allegations present many of the same background and legal arguments in each, making much of the two responses duplicative;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7.4(b), Plaintiff hereby moves the Court for permission to file a single brief not to exceed forty (40) pages instead of filing two separate twenty-five (25) page briefs.
WHEREAS, Defendant stipulates to this request and reserves its right to file two separate reply briefs of fifteen (15) pages each as provided by the Local Rule 7-4.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiff shall have up to forty (40) pages to file a combined opposition to Defendant's Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation and Defendant's Motion to Strike Class Allegations.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August ____, 2011
Honorable Jeremy Fogel
The Parties respectfully request that this Court enter this Stipulation.
Dated: August 8, 2011
AGREED TO BY:
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.