Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ricardo Valdez v. Correctional Officers Walker

August 29, 2011

RICARDO VALDEZ,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WALKER, GUFFEE, AND VORON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: David Alan Ezra United States District Judge

SECOND AMENDED RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER SECOND AMENDED RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16(b)(1) and the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, LR 240(a), the Court enters this scheduling order to reflect the trial date and other deadlines.

The Parties are NOTIFIED that all pretrial proceedings will be conducted by telecommunications technologies to allow Plaintiff to remain in the penal institution. See42 U.S.C. § 1997e(f). At the court's discretion, hearings may be conducted in the institution, subject to institution officials' agreement. Id.

When practicable, counsel shall be allowed to participate by telecommunications technology when any pretrial proceeding is held in the prison.

TRIAL AND CONFERENCE SCHEDULING:

1. Jury trial in this matter will commence before the Honorable David Alan Ezra, United States District Judge on March 13, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

2. A final pre-trial conference shall be held on February 8, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable David Alan Ezra, United States District Judge.

3. Pursuant to LR 281, each party herein shall serve and file a separate pre-trial statement by February 1, 2012.

MOTIONS:

4. All motions to join additional parties or to amend the pleadings shall be filed by [CLOSED].

5. When defendants rely on the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust prison administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), defendants shall file a dispositive motion to that effect, or notify the Court that they are waiving this defense and will not be filing such a motion, by [CLOSED].

6. Motions in limine shall be filed February 13, 2012. Opposition memoranda to a motion in limine shall be filed by February 20, 2012.

7. All motions not otherwise provided for herein shall be filed by October 26, 2011.

8. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, each party shall file only one motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Leave to file additional motions for summary judgment may be granted by the Court when ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.